CyberISolve

Secure Code Review

Reviewing your application’s actual source code for the vulnerabilities dynamic testing alone can miss.

Who this is for: Development teams that want vulnerabilities found in code before it ships, not just tested against the running application afterward.

The Problem

Dynamic testing (like a penetration test) finds what’s exploitable in a running application, but some vulnerabilities, a subtle logic flaw, an insecure cryptographic implementation, are far easier to catch by actually reading the code.

Our Solution

We review source code manually, supported by static analysis tooling, focused on the vulnerability classes that dynamic testing tends to miss.

What's included

This is typically scoped alongside Web Application Security or DevSecOps engagements, source code access allows us to confirm findings precisely and catch issues that black-box testing alone wouldn’t surface.

Benefits

Our Process

1

Scope

Identify the codebase and areas of highest risk.

2

Static Analysis

Run automated tooling as a first pass.

3

Manual Review

Review high-risk areas by hand.

4

Report

Findings tied to specific code locations, with fixes.

5

Retest

Confirm fixes were implemented correctly.

Request a Penetration Test

Frequently asked questions

Do we need to share our full codebase?

Scope is agreed in advance, often focused on the highest-risk components (authentication, payment handling, data access) rather than requiring a full-codebase review.

Is this a replacement for penetration testing?

No, the two find different things; code review catches issues visible in the source, penetration testing catches issues visible in the running, deployed application. They work best together.

Related services

Not sure if this is the right fit?

Tell us what's worrying you. We'll tell you what actually needs fixing first.

CallBook a Consultation